Re: Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Nick Patavalis <npat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?
From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 09:15:44 -0600
In-reply-to: <slrnd01qr6.ikk.npat@draco.priv.inaccessnetworks.com>
References: <slrnd01o3m.7gu.npat@draco.priv.inaccessnetworks.com> <6.2.0.14.2.20050202085414.020cfaf8@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com> <slrnd01qr6.ikk.npat@draco.priv.inaccessnetworks.com>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Nick,

>Well, I guess something about an incomplete type, or undefined type, or similar.

What type is incomplete or undefined?

The types used are:
+ int
+ struct foo
+ struct bar*

All those types are complete and defined.

--Eljay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?
  - From: Nick Patavalis

References:
- Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?
  - From: Nick Patavalis
- Re: Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen
- Re: Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?
  - From: Nick Patavalis

Prev by Date: Re: Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?
Next by Date: Re: Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?
Previous by thread: Re: Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?
Next by thread: Re: Pointer to undeclared structure-type considered ok?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux