paddb vs paddw

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



      1 #include<stdio.h>
      2 #include<inttypes.h>
      3 int main()
      4 {
      5         uint8_t
a[8]={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8},b[8]={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8},i;
      6         asm("movq (%1), %%mm0 \n"
      7             "paddb (%0), %%mm0 \n"
      8             "movq  %%mm0, (%0) \n"
      9                 :
     10                 :"r"(b),"r"(a)
     11                 :"%mm0"
     12         );
     13         for(i=0;i<8;i++)
     14         printf("%d ",b[i]);
     15         return 0;
     16 }
     17
Both the programs give the same output

WHY IS IT SO? i am using paddb and paddw. it dosent
make any diff?

  1 #include<stdio.h>
      2 #include<inttypes.h>
      3 int main()
      4 {
      5         uint8_t
a[8]={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8},b[8]={1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8},i;
      6         asm("movq (%1), %%mm0 \n"
      7             "paddd (%0), %%mm0 \n"
      8             "movq  %%mm0, (%0) \n"
      9                 :
     10                 :"r"(b),"r"(a)
     11                 :"%mm0"
     12         );
     13         for(i=0;i<8;i++)
     14         printf("%d ",b[i]);
     15         return 0;
     16 }
     17
~

ankit jain

________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" 
your friends today! Download Messenger Now 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux