Re: gcc brace enclosed initializer problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jack Marr wrote:

We acknowledge that the braces are not needed, but it's not apparent why this should be an *error* rather than a mere warning as it is when the same code is compiled with gcc. We've squinted at ISO 14882 section 8.5.1 (dcl.init.aggr), but haven't seen why this should be an *error*. I understand that gcc/g++ is sometimes more standards compliant than other compilers, but we're not sure if this is the case here, and thought this might actually be a g++ bug.

it is an error. EDG 3.4 rejects the code in strict mode, but gives warnings in non-strict mode. 8.5.1/2 applies recursively to give '{"how now"}' as an initializer for a 'char const *' object. 8.5 does not give it as a valid initializer form. The nearest one gets is /13 which allows an extra set at the top level.

If you feel strongly, submit a bug report.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::     CodeSourcery LLC
nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    ::     http://www.planetfall.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk


[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux