Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question

To: Robert Dewar <dewar@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question
From: Luca Benini <lbenini@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:40:37 +0100
Cc: Dave Korn <dk@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Gerald Pfeifer'" <gerald@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Beschorner Daniel'" <Daniel.Beschorner@xxxxxxxxxx>, gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <419B36CA.4060400@gnat.com>
References: <NUTMEG0wzGDCvPeSHvn00000800@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <419B3277.9060209@csr.unibo.it> <419B36CA.4060400@gnat.com>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041111)

Robert Dewar wrote:

not!


Now I see the light.


But in this case the asm produced are not the same.

Luca Benini

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question
  - From: Robert Dewar
- RE: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- RE: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question
  - From: Luca Benini
- Re: gcc 3.3 / i386 / -O2 question
  - From: Robert Dewar