On 5 Oct 2004, lrtaylor@xxxxxxxxxx stated: > More information would be useful. For example, what was your configure > line, where is GCC being installed, and where were you expecting it to > be installed? The original poster may be referring to the move of GCC's tool executables (cc1, cc1plus, collect2 and so on) into a subdirectory of libexec (well, $libexecdir, where the GNU Coding Standards have always suggested that `executable programs to be run by other programs' should reside). This was implemented by Geoff Keating in <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg02803.html> (the version that was finally committed was <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-07/msg03026.html>). Nobody objected. But you're right in that the complaint is vague enough that it could refer to virtually anything else ;} -- `[...] I certainly enjoyed putting it down. Perhaps I would have enjoyed putting it down even more if I were a veterinarian.' --- Mike Andrews on Dan Brown's _Digital Fortress_
