I take care of software I develop. I appreciate feedback on problems with my software. I was one of the first to point out the problem with a new Intel chip that gave rise to a similar problem. I guess now people just throw up their hands trying to have some IEEE-type standard for rounding, and criticize the messenger. Good luck. On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 02:53:12PM -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote: : Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 14:53:12 -0400 (EDT) : From: Ishwar Rattan <ishwar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : To: Lester Ingber <ingber@xxxxxxxxxx> : Cc: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx : Subject: Re: exp() bug? : In-Reply-To: <20041005163504.GA26210@xxxxxxxxxx> : : : : On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Lester Ingber wrote: : : > Eljay: : > : > Hi. Thanks for your reply. : > : > Yes, I agree with the situation, but I still am surprised that after : > all these years gcc has not produced an option to ensure consistent : > results. : : Would you like a submit a patch to that effect? You ignored what Eljay : pointed out.. : : -ishwar -- Prof. Lester Ingber ingber@xxxxxxxxxx ingber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.ingber.com www.alumni.caltech.edu/~ingber
