Hi,
I'm new to this mailing list, so if I'm offending the etiquette, please excuse me.
I updated to gcc-3.4.1 and try to compile a c++-project I have written. Some of my code did not compile so I read the "Current Changes" for gcc-3.4 and found some interesting information.
1) The hint about non-dependent name lookup in templates (example with foo(int) and foo(char)): Does this mean the order of funtion overloading does matter?
2) The hint about the unqualified names no longer to be found in dependent template base classes: What is the reason for this behavior? (I know this is a question about the standard but maybe someone can tell me anyway).
TIA
Markus -- :wq
/(bb|[^b]{2})/Markus Trenkwalder Student of Computer Engineering at TU-Wien
