Yes, I certainly will. Is there any pragma or the like to disable gcc optimizations around a certain part of a file? Trying to get around this is taking way too long :). Thanks, Adruab On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 19:59, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > Adrian Bentley <adruab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > And I'm indirecting off of iter which is being incremented every > > iteration. But for some reason it looks like gcc decided to use the > > original value of iter for the 10th iteration (1 greater than the value > > for length my example is using) inside the sample case I have... (i.e. > > rather than using the incremented value). So it looks like it was > > trying to optimize out an expression that wasn't constant (either in > > attempting to optimize the first if statement out of the loop). It > > doesn't do this when I turn optimization off... so it definitely looks > > like an optimizer bug. > > > > Anyways, I'm not sure why it would do this as iter is being changed > > every iteration. Oh well, I'm gonna manually do some unrolling and > > hopefully it won't break any more. Hope that helps anyone interested in > > the issue. > > If you have time, please submit a bug report. See > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html > > Thanks. > > Ian > >
