Re: Copy constructor with non const rhs arg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: paul moore <paulmoore100@xxxxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Copy constructor with non const rhs arg
From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 11:15:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <6.0.3.0.2.20040512110334.020788a8@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>
References: <Sea2-DAV40NjVuMhvqg0000ceab@hotmail.com> <6.0.3.0.2.20040512110334.020788a8@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Paul,

How about pass-by-value instead of pass-by-reference?

After all, an auto_ptr as a parameter should always be pass-by-value. That's the semantic of pass-by-value for auto_ptr: a transfer of ownership.

--Eljay

References:
- Copy constructor with non const rhs arg
  - From: paul moore
- Re: Copy constructor with non const rhs arg
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen

Prev by Date: Re: Copy constructor with non const rhs arg
Next by Date: Re: Copy constructor with non const rhs arg
Previous by thread: Re: Copy constructor with non const rhs arg
Next by thread: RE: Copy constructor with non const rhs arg
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux