Hello Eljay Thanks for answering so quiclkly. I still have some questions/remarks... > >Is this invalid C++ code ? > > Yes, this is invalid C++ code. > Humm... do you have any reference about that ? > >If yes is there a way to make it valid and compilable under Linux ? > > Take the typedef out of the anonymous struct. > --or-- > Name the anonymous struct so it is no longer anonymous. > > I favor the second. > I already thought about these 2 possibilities... but none of them is actually suitable: this anonymous struct is generated by a macro that take a type as parameter (aim of the typedef) which is particular to this structure. So any other idea ?
