Wrong wording, should be, no emitted error/warning. Sorry for the confusion. On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 00:15, Chris Croswhite wrote: > Could someone tell me how this is legal: > > gcc 3.2.3 in 64b (Opteron, linux) seems not to mind, > > void * foo; > (int)(word_t)foo; > > Shouldn't gcc emmit a warning (as is the case of just doing a > void*->int)or an error or is this a legal cast? > > TIA, > Chris >
