Re: Inheriting public member functions broken in gcc 3.3.2?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Adrian Bentley <adruab@xxxxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Inheriting public member functions broken in gcc 3.3.2?
From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:55:41 -0600
In-reply-to: <BAY7-F106bT4nOZVa6X00034625@hotmail.com>
References: <BAY7-F106bT4nOZVa6X00034625@hotmail.com>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Adrian,

Could you supply a compilable, minimal code example that demonstrates the problem.

Thanks,
--Eljay

References:
- Inheriting public member functions broken in gcc 3.3.2?
  - From: Adrian Bentley

Prev by Date: Inheriting public member functions broken in gcc 3.3.2?
Next by Date: Compiling a cross-gcc (3.3.2/3.3.3)
Previous by thread: Inheriting public member functions broken in gcc 3.3.2?
Next by thread: Compiling a cross-gcc (3.3.2/3.3.3)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux