Re: gcc 3.4 Compiler warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Ehrlicher <ehrlicher@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I got following warning where I don't expect.
> "null argument where non-null required (arg 2)"
> 
>      memmove(tmp1,0,MY_RET_DEF_SIZ(0));
> 
> It works because MY_RET_DEF_SIZ return 0 and so I think the warning
> isn't usefull there.

The warning is correct; the standard requires a valid pointer even if
the length is zero. This is not very likely to cause problems with
actual implementations, though.

-- 
	Falk

[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux