Hello, > > I already had binutils installed (for the correct > target), and the > correct path was already included in $PATH. This > directory contains > i586-pc-linux-gnu-* symlinks, I guess this is > correct? (I didn't specify > this in the ./configure, they 'just appeared') The > (gcc) Makefile seems > to be prepared for this. So does $prefix/i586-pc-linux-gnu/bin contain binutils? Somehow, when gcc is configured, it's supposed to realize that the tools are in that directory. > So, I still have a few questions: > - If I unpack the binutils source in the same tree > as gcc, will it > 'automagically' also be built and installed? > - If not, why does ./gcc/xgcc tell me 'as' is the > assembler to use? How > can I change this? Pretty much. Usually what I do is decompress binutils, decompress gcc, create a new directory build, symlink gcc/* to build/ and binutils/* to build/ . Then create an objdir, configuring ../build/configure and so forth. Hope that helps. Dara __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
