Am 17.11.2003 um 16:03 schrieb Nathan Sidwell:
> Thimo Neubauer wrote:
>
> >template <int dim>
> >void foo2() {
> > Entity<dim> e;
> >
> > // works like above
> > e.other();
> > e.print("test");
> >
> > // fails with syntax error
> > e.test<1>();
> e.template test<1> ();
>
> e's type is dependent, so at parse time 'test' is presumed to be not a
> template and thus the '<' is a less than operator, rather than starting
> a template argument list.
Thanks for your info. Is there any way to resolve this ambiguity? If I
understand the Stroustrup correctly, the < has to be interpreted as
the start of template-arguments if the identifier before it is a
template-name.
Should I file a bug to gcc or do I have to rewrite the program? Right
now we have to use the Intel "icc" to get our project working and I'd
very much like to change that...
Cheers
Thimo
