Re: pure virtual w/implementation bug in GCC 3.3?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi m,

Thank you for the clarification.  :-)

10.4 paragraph 2 clearly shows that the construct is illegal.

I'll use the sanctioned form:
class Foo { public: virtual ~Foo() = 0; };
inline Foo::~Foo() { }

Sincerely,
--Eljay



[Index of Archives]     [Linux C Programming]     [Linux Kernel]     [eCos]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Autoconf]     [The DWARVES Debugging Tools]     [Yosemite Campsites]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux GCC]

  Powered by Linux