Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Oliver Kullmann <O.Kullmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:46:56 -0500
In-reply-to: <20030911163705.GA19868@swan.ac.uk>
References: <5.2.1.1.0.20030911110503.00bb5d20@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com> <5.2.1.1.0.20030911110503.00bb5d20@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Oliver,

Even when doing...
  auto Bar quux(Foo());
...it still takes it as a declaration instead of a definition.  That doesn't seem kosher at all.

--Eljay

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
  - From: Oliver Kullmann

References:
- Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen
- Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
  - From: Oliver Kullmann

Prev by Date: Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
Next by Date: Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
Previous by thread: Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
Next by thread: Re: Does GCC 3.4 fix this bug?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux