Thanx michal017@xxxxxxxxxx, Rupert Wood and others for your responses
Eljay Love-Jensen wrote:
>Your macro magic expand to...
>int square_func(int) void snodx() { return; }; //LINE 5
>...which is not valid C or C++. If you want, you could make
your own computer programming language where this is a valid syntax.
If square_func is not valid C or C++ syntax then the same property of invalid
C/C++ syntax should apply to
extern int fcloseall(void) __THROW;
which should expand to
extern int fcloseall(void) throw();
When I declare square_func(int) as
int square_func(int) __THROW;
then the code compiles fine with gcc
"m" <michal017@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Isn't throw() or throw a reserved keyword?
>You can't override int or char or bool or void.. so you can't override throw.. ;)
>That's how I understand it..
My question is according to the 'C' language valid forms of function declarations are:
<storage-class-type> <return-type> <function-name>(<parameter type list>);
But then
extern int fcloseall(void) __THROW;
does'nt seem to fit into this syntax.
If terms like __THROW are allowed then is it possible to use custom defined
macros like __SNODX? If only a set of reserved terms are permitted as m pointed out
then where is the list of these terms?
Thanx in advance.
Eagerly awaiting responses.
SNODX
