Re: sizeof(function) functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: bnd25@xxxxxxxxx, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: sizeof(function) functionality
From: Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 06:58:57 -0500
Cc: Kristis Makris <kristis.makris@xxxxxxx>, gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200307090418.33202.bndavis@ntlworld.com>
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030708221406.02754d70@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com> <orllv8u0d3.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <5.2.0.9.0.20030708221406.02754d70@iplan-mn.corp.adobe.com>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Ben,

>They do honour ().

Oops, yes... they do honor () for determining if the comma is for the macro, or for the parameter.

Just shows how little I use macros.

I stand corrected,
--Eljay

References:
- Re: sizeof(function) functionality
  - From: Eljay Love-Jensen
- Re: sizeof(function) functionality
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: sizeof(function) functionality
  - From: Ben Davis

Prev by Date: Does gcc 3.2 C++ ABI change apply to C function call?
Next by Date: Re: Does gcc 3.2 C++ ABI change apply to C function call?
Previous by thread: Re: sizeof(function) functionality
Next by thread: Re: sizeof(function) functionality
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux