y2bismil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > If there is another group specific to the GNU assembler, please let me know. See http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/ The mailing list is binutils@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > On to the question. Does anyone know an equivalent code in assembler for > intel's word 'struc'. > > As in: > ****************************** > 23: MAP_IO_S struc > 24: ioc_select_reg db ?, ? #IOC select register > 25: panel_ctrl_reg db ?, ? #panel control register > 26: MMAP_IO_S ends > ****************************** > > I did some searching and actually found a post that claimed that by placing > .intel_syntax at teh top of the file, the file would compile using intel > assembly syntax. .intel_syntax makes gas support the instruction syntax documented in the Intel manuals. It does not change gas's behaviour outside of instructions. In particular, it does not add support for struct, db, or ends. gas does support a .struct pseudo-op, but the syntax and usage is different. Ian
