Re: Anonymous union and c99

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "S T" <eladb6g02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Anonymous union and c99
From: Falk Hueffner <falk.hueffner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09 Oct 2003 13:04:29 +0200
Cc: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <28281-18568@sneakemail.com>
References: <28281-18568@sneakemail.com>
Sender: gcc-help-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.5 (cabbage)

"S T" <eladb6g02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Does anyone know whether anonymous unions/structs are part of the
> c99 standard?

They're not.


-- 
	Falk

References:
- Anonymous union and c99
  - From: S T

Prev by Date: Re: How to use pre-compiled headers with gcc version 3.2.2
Next by Date: Re: this looks like a bug - arm target
Previous by thread: Anonymous union and c99
Next by thread: how do the -fvolatile- switches work?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux C Programming] [Linux Kernel] [eCos] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Autoconf] [The DWARVES Debugging Tools] [Yosemite Campsites] [Yosemite News] [Linux GCC]

Powered by Linux