Hi Eljay,
what comes out is this:
typedef void ASY_TESTPROC_T ((OIDC_T lastmatch, int compc, OIDC_T *compl,
...));
The only difference from the original code that I notice is the __ has been
removed. I should mention that OIDC_T is a typedef not a macro. I'm checking
as I type, if I change it to unsigned long directly if that makes a difference.
nope...no differnece replaing OIDC_T directly with unsigned int
What is funny is the group of functions declared similar to it come out
differently in the preprocessor:
*****************************************************************************
typedef void ASY_TESTPROC_T __((OIDC_T lastmatch, int compc, OIDC_T *compl,
...));
typedef void ASY_GETPROC_T __((OIDC_T lastmatch, int compc, OIDC_T *compl,
...));
typedef void ASY_SETPROC_T __((OIDC_T lastmatch, int compc, OIDC_T *compl,
...));
typedef void ASY_NEXTPROC_T __((OIDC_T lastmatch, int compc, OIDC_T *compl,
...));
*****************************************************************************
comes out as
*****************************************************************************
typedef void ASY_TESTPROC_T ((OIDC_T lastmatch, int compc, OIDC_T *compl,
...));
typedef void ASY_GETPROC_T (OIDC_T lastmatch, int compc, OIDC_T *compl, ...);
typedef void ASY_SETPROC_T (OIDC_T lastmatch, int compc, OIDC_T *compl, ...);
typedef void ASY_NEXTPROC_T (OIDC_T lastmatch, int compc, OIDC_T *compl, ...);
*****************************************************************************
Notice how only the first one ASY_TESTPROC_T has the double paranthesis, and is
on 2 lines.
Yamin
Quoting Eljay Love-Jensen <eljay@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi Yamin,
>
> What does the -E (preprocess only) output of that code look like?
>
> --Eljay
>
>
----------------------------------------
This mail sent through www.mywaterloo.ca
