Re: [PATCH 4/4] f2fs/009: detect and repair nlink corruption

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On 3/10/25 16:00, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:18:09PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> This is a regression test to check whether fsck can handle corrupted
>> nlinks correctly, it uses inject.f2fs to inject nlinks w/ wrong value,
>> and expects fsck.f2fs can detect such corruption and do the repair.
>>
>> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
> 
> Hi Chao,
> 
> I planned to merge patch 1~3 at first. But as you need to change this
> patch more, and might need to change other patches, so how about you
> send v2 with all this patchset. I'll wait your v2 :)
> 
> Some review points as below...
> 
>>  tests/f2fs/009     | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  tests/f2fs/009.out |   2 +
>>  2 files changed, 144 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100755 tests/f2fs/009
>>  create mode 100644 tests/f2fs/009.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/009 b/tests/f2fs/009
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 00000000..8f6a3e11
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/f2fs/009
>> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) 2025 Chao Yu.  All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test No. f2fs/009
>> +#
>> +# This is a regression test to check whether fsck can handle corrupted
>> +# nlinks correctly, it uses inject.f2fs to inject nlinks w/ wrong value,
>> +# and expects fsck.f2fs can detect such corruption and do the repair.
>> +#
>> +. ./common/preamble
>> +_begin_fstest auto quick
>> +
>> +_require_scratch
>> +
>> +dir=$SCRATCH_MNT
>> +filename=$dir/foo
>> +hardlink=$dir/bar
>> +
>> +for ((i=0;i<14;i++)) do
>> +	echo "round: " $i >> $seqres.full
>> +
>> +	_scratch_mkfs "-f" >> $seqres.full
> 
> Can we give "-f" to _scratch_mkfs "f2fs" part? Likes:

Looks better,

> 
>   diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
>   index bf24da4eb..cafe2f3dd 100644
>   --- a/common/rc
>   +++ b/common/rc
>   @@ -993,7 +993,7 @@ _scratch_mkfs()
>                   mkfs_filter="grep -v -e ^Warning: -e \"^mke2fs \""
>                   ;;
>           f2fs)
>   -               mkfs_cmd="$MKFS_F2FS_PROG"
>   +               mkfs_cmd="$MKFS_F2FS_PROG -f"
>                   mkfs_filter="cat"
>                   ;;
> 
> 
> 
>> +	_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
>> +
>> +	if [ $i == 0 ]; then
>> +		touch $filename
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 1 ]; then
>> +		mkdir $filename
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		nlink=1
>> +	elif [ $i == 2 ]; then
>> +		mknod $filename c 9 0
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 3 ]; then
>> +		mknod $filename b 8 0
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 4 ]; then
>> +		mkfifo $filename
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 5 ]; then
>> +		socket -s $filename >> $seqres.full 2>&1 &
>> +		pid=$!
>> +		sleep 2
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		kill $pid >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 6 ]; then
>> +		ln -s $dir/empty $filename
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 7 ]; then
>> +		# orphan inode
>> +		touch $filename
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		$F2FS_IO_PROG write 1 0 1 zero atomic_commit $filename 5000 >> $seqres.full 2>&1 &
>> +		stat $filename >> $seqres.full
>> +		rm $filename
>> +		$F2FS_IO_PROG shutdown 1 $dir/ >> $seqres.full
>> +		sleep 6
>> +		nlink=1
>> +	elif [ $i == 8 ]; then
>> +		# hardlink on file
>> +		touch $filename
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		ln $filename $hardlink
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 9 ]; then
>> +		# hardlink on charactor
>> +		mknod $filename c 9 0
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		ln $filename $hardlink
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 10 ]; then
>> +		# hardlink on blockdev
>> +		mknod $filename b 8 0
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		ln $filename $hardlink
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 11 ]; then
>> +		# hardlink on pipe
>> +		mkfifo $filename
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		ln $filename $hardlink
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 12 ]; then
>> +		# hardlink on socket
>> +		socket -s $filename >> $seqres.full 2>&1 &
>> +		pid=$!
>> +		sleep 2
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		kill $pid >> $seqres.full 2>&1
>> +		ln $filename $hardlink
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	elif [ $i == 13 ]; then
>> +		# hardlink on symlink
>> +		ln -s $dir/empty $filename
>> +		ino=`stat $filename | awk '/Inode:/ {print $4}'`
>> +		ln $filename $hardlink
>> +		nlink=0
>> +	fi
>> +
>> +	if [ $i != 7 ]; then
>> +		stat $dir/* >> $seqres.full
>> +	fi
>> +	echo "ino:"$ino >> $seqres.full
>> +	echo "nlink:"$nlink >> $seqres.full
>> +
>> +	_scratch_unmount
>> +
>> +	$F2FS_INJECT_PROG --node --mb i_links --nid $ino --val $nlink $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full
>> +	if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>> +		exit
>> +	fi
>> +
>> +	export FSCK_OPTIONS="-f"
> 
> You've set below code in _repair_scratch_fs():
> 
>     f2fs)
>         fsck -t $FSTYP -f $SCRATCH_DEV
>         ;;
> 
> The FSCK_OPTIONS="-f" is useless.
> 
>> +	_repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full
>> +	if [ $? != 1 ]; then
> 
> What does $?=1 mean? Does $?=1 mean finding corruption and fixed, $?=0 mean no corruption?

That's correct.

> 
> If you want to detect there's a corruption, then fix it, then check if it's fixed. How about
> calling _check_scratch_fs at first to get the corruption error you expect, then call
> _repair_scratch_fs to fix it. Then call _check_scratch_fs to make sure the corruption is
> fixed?
> 
> Something likes (just a rough example)
> 
> _check_scratch_fs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 && _fail "can't find corruption"

You mean this?

export FSCK_OPTIONS="--dry-run"
_check_scratch_fs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 || _fail "can't find corruption"

We need to export FSCK_OPTIONS w/ "--dry-run", otherwise _check_scratch_fs
will be stuck once it detects corruption.

> _repair_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full
> _check_scratch_fs
> 
>> +		_fail "fsck can not detect and repair zero nlink corruption "$i
>> +		exit
>> +	fi
>> +
>> +	export FSCK_OPTIONS=""
>> +	_check_scratch_fs >> $seqres.full
> 
> I think _check_scratch_fs outputs nothing if run passed, right?
> 
> _check_scratch_fs calls _check_generic_filesystem for f2fs, the FSCK_OPTIONS
> is "null" by default, so above FSCK_OPTIONS="" is useless too.
> 
>> +	if [ $? != 0 ]; then
>> +		_fail "fsck hasn't fixed nlink corruption "$i
>> +		exit
>> +	fi
>> +
>> +	_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full
> 
> ">> $seqres.full" isn't necessary.

Will update according to you comments, thanks a lot.

Thanks,

> 
>> +	_scratch_unmount
>> +done
>> +
>> +echo "Silence is golden"
>> +
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/tests/f2fs/009.out b/tests/f2fs/009.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..7e977155
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/f2fs/009.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
>> +QA output created by 009
>> +Silence is golden
>> -- 
>> 2.48.1
>>
>>
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux