On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 01:26:29PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > As I've noted elsewhere, the use of process session ids to "isolate" > test instances from killing each other is kind of hacky and creates > other weird side effects. I'd rather everyone use the new code that > runs everything in proper isolation with private pid and mount > namespaces, but I don't know how many people this would break were it a > hard dependency. > > Deprecate the process session handling immediately with a warning that > we're going to rip it out in a year. > > Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> Ok, that answers some of the questions I raised - the session-id support is time limited and makes people very aware of it. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
