On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 08:24:00PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 02:28:26PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 03:27:15PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > c) Putting test subprocesses in a systemd sub-scope and telling systemd > > > to kill the sub-scope could work because ./check can already use it to > > > ensure that all child processes of a test are killed. However, this is > > > an *optional* feature, which means that we'd have to require systemd. > > > > ... requiring systemd was somewhat of a show-stopper for testing > > older distros. > > Isn't RHEL7 the oldest one at this point? And it does systemd. At this > point the only reason I didn't go full systemd is out of consideration > for Devuan, since they probably need QA. I have no idea what is out there in distro land vs what fstests "supports". All I know is that there are distros out there that don't use systemd. It feels like poor form to prevent generic filesystem QA infrastructure from running on those distros by making an avoidable choice to tie the infrastructure exclusively to systemd-based functionality.... -Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
