From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Zorro reports that this test fails if the test runner set an -L (label)
option in MKFS_OPTIONS. Fix the test to work around this with a bunch
of horrid sed filtering magic. It's probably not *critical* to make
this test test work with random labels, but it'd be nice not to lose
them.
Cc: <fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v2024.10.14
Fixes: 2f7e1b8a6f09b6 ("xfs/157,xfs/547,xfs/548: switch to using _scratch_mkfs_sized")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/xfs/157 | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/xfs/157 b/tests/xfs/157
index e102a5a10abe4b..0c21786e389695 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/157
+++ b/tests/xfs/157
@@ -65,9 +65,34 @@ scenario() {
SCRATCH_RTDEV=$orig_rtdev
}
+extract_mkfs_label() {
+ set -- $MKFS_OPTIONS
+ local in_l
+
+ for arg in "$@"; do
+ if [ "$in_l" = "1" ]; then
+ echo "$arg"
+ return 0
+ elif [ "$arg" = "-L" ]; then
+ in_l=1
+ fi
+ done
+ return 1
+}
+
check_label() {
- _scratch_mkfs_sized "$fs_size" "" -L oldlabel >> $seqres.full 2>&1
- _scratch_xfs_db -c label
+ local existing_label
+ local filter
+
+ # Handle -L somelabel being set in MKFS_OPTIONS
+ if existing_label="$(extract_mkfs_label)"; then
+ filter=(sed -e "s|$existing_label|oldlabel|g")
+ _scratch_mkfs_sized $fs_size >> $seqres.full
+ else
+ filter=(cat)
+ _scratch_mkfs_sized "$fs_size" "" -L oldlabel >> $seqres.full 2>&1
+ fi
+ _scratch_xfs_db -c label | "${filter[@]}"
_scratch_xfs_admin -L newlabel "$@" >> $seqres.full
_scratch_xfs_db -c label
_scratch_xfs_repair -n &>> $seqres.full || echo "Check failed?"
