Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fstests/xfs: a couple growfs log recovery tests

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fstests/xfs: a couple growfs log recovery tests
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 05:36:59 +0100
Cc: fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, djwong@xxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20241029172135.329428-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
References: <20241029172135.329428-1-bfoster@redhat.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

Still looks good to me (but I'm a horrible test reviewer, so that
might not count much :)):

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fstests/xfs: a couple growfs log recovery tests
  - From: Zorro Lang

References:
- [PATCH v2 0/2] fstests/xfs: a couple growfs log recovery tests
  - From: Brian Foster

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] btrfs/287: make the test work when compression is enabled
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: add a test for defrag of contiguous file extents
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: online grow vs. log recovery stress test (realtime version)
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] fstests/xfs: a couple growfs log recovery tests
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems Development] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux