On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:34:03PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > I believe you reproduced a problem with your customized realtime variant > of the initial test. I've not been able to reproduce any test failures > with patch 2 here, though I have tried to streamline the test a bit to > reduce unnecessary bits (patch 1 still reproduces the original > problems). I also don't tend to test much with rt, so it's possible my > config is off somehow or another. Otherwise I _think_ I've included the > necessary changes for rt support in the test itself. > > Thoughts? I'd like to figure out what might be going on there before > this should land.. Darrick mentioned that was just with his rt group patchset, which make sense as we don't have per-group metadata without that. Anyway, the series looks good to me, and I think it supersedes my more targeted hand crafted reproducer.
