Re: [RFC PATCH] generic: test negative timespecs are accurate

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 05:45:28PM +0200, Alyssa Ross wrote:
> Link: https://github.com/koverstreet/bcachefs/issues/743

Great, a bcachefs regression test case :)

Can you add a bit more details in commit log, not only a link.

> Signed-off-by: Alyssa Ross <hi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This is an adapted version of generic/258, but it tests that the stored 
> timestamp is accurate to the second, rather than just testing the 
> timestamp remains negative.  I created a new test rather than just
> making 258 more precise, because I understand that there may be
> filesystems that don't store timestamps that accurately by design.
> As an example, I've heard that FAT only has 2 second precision, so this
> patch is an RFC because I'm not sure how I should write a _require
> function (if at all) that restricts the test to filesystems that are
> expected to be able to do this.
> 
>  tests/generic/363     | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/generic/363.out |  2 ++

The g/363 has been taken, please rebase to latest for-next branch.
You can use `xfstests/tools/mvtest generic/363 generic/365` to change
the case number, before rebasing.

>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/generic/363
>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/363.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/363 b/tests/generic/363
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..50459d01
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/363
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2011 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
> +# Copyright (c) 2024 Alyssa Ross.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 363
> +#
> +# Test timestamps prior to epoch with nanosecond components are
> +# accurate to the second.
> +# bcachefs was slightly off.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto quick bigtime
> +

As this's a bcachefs regression test:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bcachefs/20240907160024.605850-3-hi@xxxxxxxxx/

So better to mark as:
if [ "$FSTYP" = "bcachefs" ];then
	_fixed_by_kernel_commit xxxxxxxxxxxx "bcachefs: Fix negative timespecs"
fi
(replace the xxxxxxx if it's merged on mainline linux)

Others looks good to me, with above changes, I'd like to

Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>

> +_require_test
> +_require_negative_timestamps
> +
> +TESTFILE=$TEST_DIR/timestamp-test.txt
> +
> +# Create a file with a timestamp prior to the epoch
> +touch -d "1969-07-20T03:55:59.750000000+0100" $TESTFILE
> +stat -c %X $TESTFILE
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/generic/363.out b/tests/generic/363.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..052bacfd
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/generic/363.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 363
> +-14245441
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux