On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 4:58 AM Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 08:41:28AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 6:21 AM Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 08:08:44PM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > > > > Test overlayfs over xfs with and without "volatile" mount option. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Zorro, > > > > > > > > I was going to make a generic test from xfs/546, so that overlayfs could > > > > also run it, but then I realized that ext4 does not behave as xfs in > > > > that case (it returns success on syncfs post shutdown). > > > > > > > > Unless and until this behavior is made a standard, I made an overlayfs > > > > specialized test instead, which checks for underlying fs xfs. > > > > While at it, I also added test coverage for the "volatile" mount options > > > > that is expected to return succuss in that case regardles of the > > > > behavior of the underlying fs. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Amir. > > > > > > > > tests/overlay/087 | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > tests/overlay/087.out | 4 +++ > > > > 2 files changed, 66 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100755 tests/overlay/087 > > > > create mode 100644 tests/overlay/087.out > > > > > > > > diff --git a/tests/overlay/087 b/tests/overlay/087 > > > > new file mode 100755 > > > > index 00000000..a5afb0d5 > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/tests/overlay/087 > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ > > > > +#! /bin/bash > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > > > +# Copyright (c) 2022 Oracle. All Rights Reserved. > > > > +# Copyright (c) 2024 CTERA Networks. All Rights Reserved. > > > > +# > > > > +# FS QA Test No. 087 > > > > +# > > > > +# This is a variant of test xfs/546 for overlayfs > > > > +# with and without the "volatile" mount option. > > > > +# It only works over xfs underlying fs. > > > > +# > > > > +# Regression test for kernel commits: > > > > +# > > > > +# 5679897eb104 ("vfs: make sync_filesystem return errors from ->sync_fs") > > > > +# 2d86293c7075 ("xfs: return errors in xfs_fs_sync_fs") > > > > +# > > > > +# During a code inspection, I noticed that sync_filesystem ignores the return > > > > +# value of the ->sync_fs calls that it makes. sync_filesystem, in turn is used > > > > +# by the syncfs(2) syscall to persist filesystem changes to disk. This means > > > > +# that syncfs(2) does not capture internal filesystem errors that are neither > > > > +# visible from the block device (e.g. media error) nor recorded in s_wb_err. > > > > +# XFS historically returned 0 from ->sync_fs even if there were log failures, > > > > +# so that had to be corrected as well. > > > > +# > > > > +# The kernel commits above fix this problem, so this test tries to trigger the > > > > +# bug by using the shutdown ioctl on a clean, freshly mounted filesystem in the > > > > +# hope that the EIO generated as a result of the filesystem being shut down is > > > > +# only visible via ->sync_fs. > > > > +# > > > > +. ./common/preamble > > > > +_begin_fstest auto quick mount shutdown > > > > + > > > > + > > > > +# Modify as appropriate. > > > > +_require_xfs_io_command syncfs > > > > +_require_scratch_nocheck > > > > +_require_scratch_shutdown > > > > + > > > > +[ "$OVL_BASE_FSTYP" == "xfs" ] || \ > > > > + _notrun "base fs $OVL_BASE_FSTYP has unknown behavior with syncfs after shutdown" > > > > + > > > > +# Reuse the fs formatted when we checked for the shutdown ioctl, and don't > > > > +# bother checking the filesystem afterwards since we never wrote anything. > > > > +echo "=== syncfs after shutdown" > > > > +_scratch_mount > > > > +# This command is complicated a bit because in the case of overlayfs the > > > > +# syncfs fd needs to be opened before shutdown and it is different from the > > > > +# shutdown fd, so we cannot use the _scratch_shutdown() helper. > > > > +# Filter out xfs_io output of active fds. > > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "open $(_scratch_shutdown_handle)" -c 'shutdown -f ' -c close -c syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT | \ > > > > + grep -vF '[00' > > > > + > > > > +# Now repeat the same test with a volatile overlayfs mount and expect no error > > > > +_scratch_unmount > > > > +echo "=== syncfs after shutdown (volatile)" > > > > +_scratch_mount -o volatile > > > > +$XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "open $(_scratch_shutdown_handle)" -c 'shutdown -f ' -c close -c syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT | \ > > > > + grep -vF '[00' > > > > > > Oh, the test steps are much different from xfs/546. If we move x/546 to generic/, > > > can overlay reproduce this bug by that? > > > > Yes and no. > > > > For overlayfs to support this as a generic test, the helper > > _scratch_shutdown_handle must be used and the shutdown+syncfs > > command must be complicated to something like this: > > > > $XFS_IO_PROG -x -c "open $(_scratch_shutdown_handle)" -c 'shutdown -f > > ' -c close -c syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT | \ > > grep -vF '[00' > > > > This is because overlayfs itself does not support the shutdown ioctl. > > If the test is moved to generic as it is we get an error when running > > overlayfs: > > > > XFS_IOC_GOINGDOWN: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > > > because _require_scratch_shutdown is "supported" by overlayfs > > but only when the _scratch_shutdown helpers are used. > > Yeah, I know this. > > > > > If the test is to be moved as is, it will need to opt-out of overlayfs > > explicitly. > > I mean you have a "-o volatile" option test, that's an overlayfs specific > mount option. If you need that test, that's an overlay specific test, that > part can be an overlay specific test case. If not, we can use a generic > case (from xfs/546) to cover overlay and other fs. I need the -o volatile test regardless of moving xfs/546 to generic. That's why I posted this patch. > > BTW, we actually we have a common _scratch_shutdown helper, I'm wondering > if it works for this test? Likes: > > _scratch_shutdown -f > $XFS_IO_PROG -c syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT > > Can this work? Nope, because $XFS_IO_PROG -c syncfs $SCRATCH_MNT will fail (EIO) to open the directory after shutdown. That's why the dance with -c open -c close is needed. Thanks, Amir.