Re: [PATCH 10/10] swapext: make sure that we don't swap unwritten extents unless they're part of a rt extent(??)

Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] swapext: make sure that we don't swap unwritten extents unless they're part of a rt extent(??)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 21:24:53 -0700
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zlang@xxxxxxxxxx, fstests@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, guan@xxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20240619165845.GO103034@frogsfrogsfrogs>
References: <171867145284.793463.16426642605476089750.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <171867145451.793463.2794238931520323458.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <ZnJ2jieRl4-B70Ux@infradead.org> <20240619165845.GO103034@frogsfrogsfrogs>

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCHSET v30.6 2/6] fstests: atomic file updates
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 10/10] swapext: make sure that we don't swap unwritten extents unless they're part of a rt extent(??)
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- Re: [PATCH 10/10] swapext: make sure that we don't swap unwritten extents unless they're part of a rt extent(??)
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH 10/10] swapext: make sure that we don't swap unwritten extents unless they're part of a rt extent(??)
  - From: Darrick J. Wong