Hi Pankaj, Although this patchset got RVB, but looks like you still want to change it a bit, so I won't merge this patchset this week, will wait for your next version :) Thanks, Zorro On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 05:01:16PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote: > From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > These are some of the tests that failed when we were working on LBS > patches [1]. > > generic/436 and xfs/008 are adapted to work with bs > ps systems. > > xfs/161 is an upstream failure, and it happens even on bs <= ps systems. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20240503095353.3798063-1-mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Pankaj Raghav (3): > xfs/161: adapt the test case for 64k FS blocksize > generic/436: round up bufsz to nearest filesystem blksz > xfs/008: use block size instead of the pagesize > > src/seek_sanity_test.c | 8 ++++---- > tests/xfs/008 | 19 ++++++++++--------- > tests/xfs/008.out | 8 ++++---- > tests/xfs/161 | 10 ++++++++-- > 4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: b26d68da08e47e6508a96bee72b25823040ab67e > -- > 2.34.1 > >
