On 4/24/24 23:49, Zorro Lang wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:06:43AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
(I just realized that the previous attempt to send this PR failed. Resending it now.)
Zorro,
Several of the btrfs test cases were failing due to a change in the golden
output. The commits here fix them. These patches are on top of the last PR
branch staged-20240414.
Hi Anand,
Thanks for working on this! Now I've merged all 12 patches with below changes:
I added your RVB to:
fstests: btrfs: use _btrfs for 'subvolume snapshot' command
due to I trust you've reviewed it as you'd like to push it.
Yes, it's fine.
Then I reviewed those 4 patches from you (refer to mail list):
generic: move btrfs clone device testcase to the generic group
common/verity: fix btrfs-corrupt-block -v option
btrfs/290: fix btrfs_corrupt_block options
common/btrfs: refactor _require_btrfs_corrupt_block to check option
and merged these 4 patches with the review points (to save time).
Please check the "patches-in-queue" branch of upstream fstests. If you
(or other btrfs folks) feel anything wrong, feel free to tell me. If
no more changes are needed, you'll see them in next release :)
Checked patches in the patches-in-queue; they look good.
Thanks, Anand
Thanks,
Zorro
