On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 01:49:53AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 09:55:30AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > generic/095 doesn't take more than 4 seconds on any of my test setups, > > Yeah, it generally takes ~5 seconds. But there's a "LOAD_FACTOR", so On what kind of storage hardware? If it's that fast even on spinning rust then I guess you could double the iodepth*/numjobs computations. (What happens if numjobs exceeds the 9 defined in the fio config file?) > before we add it into quick group, I'd like to ask > do you think if it's worth increasing the default LOAD_FACTOR a bit to > give it more stress, or move it to quick group directly? I'd move it to the quick group. --D > > but is exercises code that handles buffered write iterations interrupted > > by concurrent direct I/O that no other test in the quick group does. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > --- > > tests/generic/095 | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tests/generic/095 b/tests/generic/095 > > index 80448200b..9d0446e98 100755 > > --- a/tests/generic/095 > > +++ b/tests/generic/095 > > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > > # Concurrent mixed I/O (buffer I/O, aiodio, mmap, splice) on the same files > > # > > . ./common/preamble > > -_begin_fstest auto rw stress > > +_begin_fstest auto quick rw stress > > > > # Import common functions. > > . ./common/filter > > -- > > 2.39.2 > > > > > >
