Re: [PATCH 02/10] btrfs/028: use the helper _btrfs_kill_stress_balance_pid

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On 3/28/24 01:11, fdmanana@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>

Now that there's a helper to kill a background process that is running
_btrfs_stress_balance(), use it in btrfs/028. It's equivalent to the
existing code in btrfs/028.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
---
  tests/btrfs/028 | 9 +++------
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/btrfs/028 b/tests/btrfs/028
index d860974e..8fbe8887 100755
--- a/tests/btrfs/028
+++ b/tests/btrfs/028
@@ -44,12 +44,9 @@ balance_pid=$!
# 30s is enough to trigger bug
  sleep $((30*$TIME_FACTOR))
-kill $fsstress_pid $balance_pid &> /dev/null
-wait
-
-# kill _btrfs_stress_balance can't end balance, so call btrfs balance cancel
-# to cancel running or paused balance. > -$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance cancel $SCRATCH_MNT &> /dev/null
+kill $fsstress_pid &> /dev/null
+wait $fsstress_pid &> /dev/null
+_btrfs_kill_stress_balance_pid $balance_pid

 I didn't understand the point of replacing 'balance cancel'
 with 'kill'. The Git change log also doesn't say anything
 about it. The old code also tested BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_CTL ioctl.

Thanks, Anand


  _run_btrfs_util_prog filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux