On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 04:58:24PM +0100, David Sterba wrote: > It is a bug in the test, it should have been xfs specific and never > promoted to generic/ and not affect btrfs unless explained how > in the first place. Well, the concept that reflinks are reasonably fast and are not live locked by ongoing I/O seems pretty natural. But I guess we can't just asusme quality of implementation everywhere, and do an opt-in like _require_non_sucky_reflink. Either way we need to document the assumptions and not add a magic exclude for a single fs.
