On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 01:59:11PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 12:55:56PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > +++ b/common/btrfs
> > @@ -111,8 +111,12 @@ _require_btrfs_fs_feature()
> > _notrun "Feature $feat not supported by the available btrfs version"
> >
> > if [ $feat = "raid56" ]; then
> > - # Zoned btrfs only supports SINGLE profile
> > - _require_non_zoned_device "${SCRATCH_DEV}"
> > + # Make sure it's in our supported configs as well
> > + _btrfs_get_profile_configs
> > + if [[ ! "${_btrfs_profile_configs[@]}" =~ "raid5" ]] ||
> > + [[ ! "${_btrfs_profile_configs[@]}" =~ "raid6" ]]; then
> > + _notrun "raid56 excluded from profile configs"
> > + fi
>
> Should _require_btrfs_fs_feature check for raid5 and raid6 individually?
> Right now it seems like you need both raid5 and raid6 in the profiles
> to run checks that probably only exercise either?
>
The tests that use this are testing them both. I could make them optionally
test one or the other depending on the profile you had set, but I don't think
this is particularly useful. If you have strong feelings about it I could
alternatively add a helper that is
_require_raid_profile "profile name"
and then add those to the different tests to be more fine grained about it,
since technically this helper is about checking if a specific kernel feature is
available. Thanks,
Josef
