I'm also not convinced that we need this test, because the bug could be reliably reproduced by running all existing tests or just a subset of the tests as I reported there.
This test case was motivated by btrfs/159; and recent report; yep, most of the lines here are taken from btrfs/159. However, I wanted a test case in the tempfsid group which exercises multi-node-same-physical; If there are no objections, I am going to add the tempfsid group to btrfs/159 for now. Thanks, Anand
