On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 07:55:26AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 05:19:34PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > I found the io_uring testing still fails as:
> > io_uring_queue_init failed
> > even if kernel supports io_uring feature.
> >
> > That because of the /proc/sys/kernel/io_uring_disabled isn't 0.
> >
> > Different value means:
> > 0 All processes can create io_uring instances as normal.
> > 1 io_uring creation is disabled (io_uring_setup() will fail with
> > -EPERM) for unprivileged processes not in the io_uring_group
> > group. Existing io_uring instances can still be used. See the
> > documentation for io_uring_group for more information.
> > 2 io_uring creation is disabled for all processes. io_uring_setup()
> > always fails with -EPERM. Existing io_uring instances can still
> > be used.
> >
> > So besides the CONFIG_IO_URING kernel config, there's another switch
> > can on or off the io_uring supporting. And the "2" or "1" might be
> > the default on some systems.
> >
> > On this situation the io_uring_queue_init returns -EPERM, so I change
> > the fsstress to ignore io_uring testing if io_uring_queue_init returns
> > -ENOSYS or -EPERM. And print different verbose message for debug.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > ltp/fsstress.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ltp/fsstress.c b/ltp/fsstress.c
> > index 482395c4..9c75f27b 100644
> > --- a/ltp/fsstress.c
> > +++ b/ltp/fsstress.c
> > @@ -762,12 +762,23 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
> > #endif
> > #ifdef URING
> > have_io_uring = true;
> > - /* If ENOSYS, just ignore uring, other errors are fatal. */
> > + /*
> > + * If ENOSYS, just ignore uring, due to kernel doesn't support it.
> > + * If EPERM, might due to sysctl kernel.io_uring_disabled isn't 0,
>
> "might be due to..."
Hahaha, as native english speaker so :)
>
> With that fixed,
> Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, I'll change below if...else... to switch... as you suggested.
>
> --D
>
> > + * or some selinux policies, etc.
> > + * Other errors are fatal.
> > + */
> > if ((c = io_uring_queue_init(URING_ENTRIES, &ring, 0)) != 0) {
> > if (c == -ENOSYS) {
> > have_io_uring = false;
> > + if (verbose)
> > + printf("io_uring isn't supported by kernel\n");
> > + } else if (c == -EPERM) {
> > + have_io_uring = false;
> > + if (verbose)
> > + printf("io_uring isn't allowed, check io_uring_disabled sysctl or selinux policy\n");
> > } else {
> > - fprintf(stderr, "io_uring_queue_init failed\n");
> > + fprintf(stderr, "io_uring_queue_init failed, errno=%d\n", c);
> > exit(1);
> > }
> > }
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
>
