Re: [PATCH 08/10] xfs/503: split copy and metadump into two tests

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 05:36:17AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/1876
> 
> What's it with these weird high test numbers?

Two reasons: I don't have to renumber all my new tests (and update the
spreadsheet I use to track upstreaming status) every time I rebase with
upstream; and the maintainer can git-am the patch as-is, without needing
to hand-edit the patches.

(Hmmm maybe fstests needs a git hook to detect a new test and
automatically renumber it.)

--D

> 
> Otherwise looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux