On 23/01/2024 01:25, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 12:17:49PM +0100, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote: >> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Some tests need to be adapted to for LBS[1] based on the filesystem >> blocksize. These are generic changes where it uses the filesystem >> blocksize instead of assuming it. >> >> There are some more generic test cases that are failing due to logdev >> size requirement that changes with filesystem blocksize. I will address >> them in a separate series. >> >> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230915183848.1018717-1-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ >> >> Pankaj Raghav (2): >> xfs/558: scale blk IO size based on the filesystem blksz >> xfs/161: adapt the test case for LBS filesystem > > Do either of these fail and require fixing for a 64k page size > system running 64kB block size? > > i.e. are these actual 64kB block size issues, or just issues with > the LBS patchset? > I had the same question in mind. Unfortunately, I don't have access to any 64k Page size machine at the moment. I will ask around if I can get access to it. @Zorro I saw you posted a test report for 64k blocksize. Is it possible for you to see if these test cases(xfs/161, xfs/558) work in your setup with 64k block size? CCing Ritesh as I saw him post a patch to fix a testcase for 64k block size.
