Re: [PATCH] overlay/026: Fix test expectation for newer kernels

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 9:52 AM Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 12, 2023 at 10:02:42AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > From: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > We now support xattr of overlayfs.* xattrs, so check that either
> > both set and get work, or neither.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Larsson <alexl@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > Zorro,
> >
> > This test is failing since overlayfs merge for v6.7-rc1, because it
> > encodes an expectation that set/get of private overlay.* xattrs
> > should fail.
> >
> > This expectation is no longer correct for new kernel, so Alex has
> > fixed the test to expect consistent behavior of set/get of private
> > overlay.* xattrs.
> >
> > We have some new tests for features merged for v6.7-rc1, but this fix
> > has higher priority, so sending it early.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Amir.
> >
> >
> >  tests/overlay/026     | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  tests/overlay/026.out |  2 --
> >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/overlay/026 b/tests/overlay/026
> > index 77030d20..f71b3f13 100755
> > --- a/tests/overlay/026
> > +++ b/tests/overlay/026
> > @@ -57,21 +57,36 @@ $SETFATTR_PROG -n "trusted.overlayfsrz" -v "n" \
> >  _getfattr --absolute-names -n "trusted.overlayfsrz" \
> >    $SCRATCH_MNT/testf0 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
> >
> > -# {s,g}etfattr of "trusted.overlay.xxx" should fail.
> > +# {s,g}etfattr of "trusted.overlay.xxx" fail on older kernels
> >  # The errno returned varies among kernel versions,
> > -#            v4.3/7   v4.8-rc1    v4.8       v4.10
> > -# setfattr  not perm  not perm   not perm   not supp
> > -# getfattr  no attr   no attr    not perm   not supp
> > +#            v4.3/7   v4.8-rc1    v4.8       v4.10     v6.7
> > +# setfattr  not perm  not perm   not perm   not supp  ok
> > +# getfattr  no attr   no attr    not perm   not supp  ok
> >  #
> > -# Consider "Operation not {supported,permitted}" pass.
> > +# Consider both "Operation not {supported,permitted}" and
> > +# "No such attribute" as pass for getattr to support all kernel
> > +# version. However, the setfattr result must match getattr.
> >  #
> > -$SETFATTR_PROG -n "trusted.overlay.fsz" -v "n" \
> > -  $SCRATCH_MNT/testf1 2>&1 | _filter_scratch | \
> > -  sed -e 's/permitted/supported/g'
> >
> > -_getfattr --absolute-names -n "trusted.overlay.fsz" \
> > +getres=$(_getfattr --absolute-names -n "trusted.overlay.fsz" \
> > +  $SCRATCH_MNT/testf1 2>&1 | _filter_scratch)
>
> Can we have a helper in common/overlay to check if current FSTYP supports
> get or set overlay.* xattr, to deal with this patch?
>

I see that Alex has already created _require_scratch_overlay_xattr_escapes()
in the patch adding test overlay/084 that I posted.

Alex,

Can you pls refactor that into _check_scratch_overlay_xattr_escapes()
and use it in this patch?

Thanks,
Amir.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux