Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs/178: don't fail when SCRATCH_DEV contains random xfs superblocks

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 11:18:33AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> The storage advertises SCSI UNMAP support, but it is of the variety
> where the UNMAP command returns immediately but takes its time to unmap
> in the background.  Subsequent rereads are allowed to return stale
> contents, per DISCARD semantics.
> 
> When the fstests cloud is not busy, the old contents disappear in a few
> seconds.  However, at peak utilization, there are ~75 VMs running, and
> the storage backend can take several minutes to commit these background
> requests.

Umm, that is not valid behavior fo SCSI UNMAP or any other command
that Linux discard maps to.  All of them can do one of the two options
on a per-block basis:

 - return the unmap pattern (usually but not always 0) for any read
   following the unmap/trim/discard
 - always return the previous pattern until it is overwritten or
   discarded again

Changing the pattern some time after unmap is a grave bug, and we need
to blacklist the device.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux