Re: [PATCH] btrfs test scan but not register the single device fs

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 05:01:30PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Recently, in the kernel commit 0d9436739af2 ("btrfs: scan but don't
> register device on single device filesystem"), we adopted an approach
> where we scan the device to validate it. However, we do not register
> it in the kernel memory since it is not required to be remembered.
> 
> However, the seed device should continue to be registered because
> otherwise, the mount operation for the sprout device will fail.
> 
> This patch ensures that we honor the mount requirements and do not break
> anything while making changes in this part of the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/btrfs/298     | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/btrfs/298.out |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/btrfs/298
>  create mode 100644 tests/btrfs/298.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/298 b/tests/btrfs/298
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..1d10d27c1354
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/298
> @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2023 Oracle.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test 298
> +#
> +#   Check if the device scan registers for a single-device seed and drops
> +#  it from the kernel if it is eventually marked as non-seed.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto quick seed
> +
> +_supported_fs btrfs
> +_require_command "$BTRFS_TUNE_PROG" btrfstune
> +_require_scratch_dev_pool 2
> +_scratch_dev_pool_get 1
> +_spare_dev_get
> +
> +$WIPEFS_PROG -a $SCRATCH_DEV

_require_command "$WIPEFS_PROG" wipefs

> +$WIPEFS_PROG -a $SPARE_DEV
> +
> +echo "#setup seed sprout device" >> $seqres.full
> +_scratch_mkfs "-b 300M" >> $seqres.full 2>&1

Better to with "|| _fail "....."", if we give specific options to _scratch_mkfs.

Others look good to me, if no more review points from others, I'll merge
this patch with above changes, and with

Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>

> +$BTRFS_TUNE_PROG -S 1 $SCRATCH_DEV
> +_scratch_mount >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device add $SPARE_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
> +_scratch_unmount
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan --forget
> +
> +echo "#Scan seed device and check using mount" >> $seqres.full
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full
> +_mount $SPARE_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> +
> +echo "#check again, ensures seed device still in kernel" >> $seqres.full
> +_mount $SPARE_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT
> +umount $SCRATCH_MNT
> +
> +echo "#Now scan of non-seed device makes kernel forget" >> $seqres.full
> +$BTRFS_TUNE_PROG -f -S 0 $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG device scan $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full
> +
> +echo "#Sprout mount must fail for missing seed device" >> $seqres.full
> +_mount $SPARE_DEV $SCRATCH_MNT > /dev/null 2>&1
> +[[ $? == 32 ]] || _fail "mount failed to fail"
> +
> +_spare_dev_put
> +_scratch_dev_pool_put
> +
> +# success, all done
> +echo Silence is golden
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/298.out b/tests/btrfs/298.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..634342678f11
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/298.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 298
> +Silence is golden
> -- 
> 2.39.3
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux