On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 22:43 +0500, stsp wrote: > > > > > > > > 03.10.2023 22:39, Jeff Layton пишет: > > > > > > > > The problem here is that old kernels are going to fail the new tests, > > and it's going to be hard to engineer the output of 478 to account for > > that. > > > > > > > What do you mean? > My patch does exactly that, and for > that I added the -U option. > > I mean that that functionality would be better implemented as a _require_* test rather than hidden plumbing inside t_ofd_locks.c like that. -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
