On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:43:50AM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote: > xfs_io pwrite issues a series of block size writes, but there is no guarantee > that the resulting extent(s) will be singular or contiguous. This behavior is > acceptable, but the test is flawed in that it expects a single extent for a > pwrite. > > Modify test to accept any layout for the reflinked logical range. > > Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > tests/generic/352 | 16 +++++++++++----- > tests/generic/352.out | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/generic/352 b/tests/generic/352 > index 52ec4850..c4ee8a44 100755 > --- a/tests/generic/352 > +++ b/tests/generic/352 > @@ -48,19 +48,25 @@ _pwrite_byte 0xcdcdcdcd 0 $blocksize $file | _filter_xfs_io > # use reflink to create the rest of the file, whose all extents are all > # pointing to the first extent > for i in $(seq 1 $nr); do > - _reflink_range $file 0 $file $(($i * $blocksize)) $blocksize > /dev/null > + _reflink_range $file 0 $file $(($i * $blocksize)) $blocksize > $tmp1.out $tmp1 isnt defined anywhere. > done > > # then call fiemap on that file to test both the shared flag and if > # reserved extent mapping search will cause soft lockup > -$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file | _filter_fiemap_flags > $tmp.out > -cat $tmp.out >> $seqres.full > +$XFS_IO_PROG -c "fiemap -v" $file | _filter_fiemap_flags > $tmp2.out > +cat $tmp2.out >> $seqres.full Nor is $tmp2 > > # refact the $LOAD_FACTOR to 1 to match the golden output > sed -i -e "s/$(($last_extent - 1))/$(($orig_last_extent - 1))/" \ > -e "s/$last_extent/$orig_last_extent/" \ > - -e "s/$end/$orig_end/" $tmp.out > -cat $tmp.out > + -e "s/$end/$orig_end/" $tmp2.out > + > +cat $tmp1.out > tmp.1 > +cat $tmp2.out > tmp.2 Not sure why you didn't make the _reflink_range and the fiemap above output to $tmp.out1 and $tmp.out2, respectively. If you had, then the default _cleanup would delete $tmp.* automatically... > + > +diff tmp.[12] > +rm tmp.1 > +rm tmp.2 ...and the rm here wouldn't be necessary. Ok. Nitpicking over. Moving on to the weirder design questions of the original test: [add original test author to cc] I don't know why $blocksize is set to 128k above. If this test needs to guarantee that there would only be *one* extent (and the golden output implies this as you note), then it should have been written to say: blocksize=$(_get_file_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT) But I don't know if the "btrfs soft lock up and return wrong shared flag" behavior required sharing a (probably multi-block) 128k range, or if that was simply what the author selected because it reproduced the problem. > > # success, all done > status=0 > diff --git a/tests/generic/352.out b/tests/generic/352.out > index 4ff66c21..ad90ae0d 100644 > --- a/tests/generic/352.out > +++ b/tests/generic/352.out > @@ -1,5 +1,3 @@ > QA output created by 352 > wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 0 > XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec) > -0: [0..2097151]: shared > -1: [2097152..2097407]: shared|last Also I suspect from the test description that the goal here was to detect the golden output failing because the shared flag does not get reported correctly. --D > -- > 2.41.0 >