Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs/213: avoid occasional failure due to already finished balance

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]



Hi,

> From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> btrfs/213 writes data, in 1M extents, for 4 seconds into a file, then
> triggers a balance and then after 2 seconds it tries to cancel the
> balance operation. More often than not, this works because the balance
> is still running after 2 seconds. However it also fails sporadically
> because balance has finished in less than 2 seconds, which is plausible
> since data and metadata are cached or other factors such as virtualized
> environment. When that's the case, it fails like this:
> 
>   $ ./check btrfs/213
>   FSTYP         -- btrfs
>   PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.4.0-rc1-btrfs-next-131+ #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu May 11 11:26:19 WEST 2023
>   MKFS_OPTIONS  -- /dev/sdc
>   MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
> 
>   btrfs/213 51s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad)
>       --- tests/btrfs/213.out	2020-06-10 19:29:03.822519250 +0100
>       +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad	2023-05-17 15:39:32.653727223 +0100
>       @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
>        QA output created by 213
>       +ERROR: balance cancel on '/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1' failed: Not in progress
>        Silence is golden
>       ...
>       (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/213.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
>   Ran: btrfs/213
>   Failures: btrfs/213
>   Failed 1 of 1 tests
> 
> To make it much less likely that balance has already finished before we
> try to cancel it, unmount and mount again the filesystem before starting
> balance, to clear cached metadata and data, and also double the time we
> spend writing 1M data extents. Also make the test not run with an
> informative message if we detect that balance finished before we could
> cancel it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> v2: Make the test _notrun if we detect that balance finished before we
>     could cancel it.
> 
>  tests/btrfs/213 | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/btrfs/213 b/tests/btrfs/213
> index e16e41c0..5666d9b9 100755
> --- a/tests/btrfs/213
> +++ b/tests/btrfs/213
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ _fixed_by_kernel_commit 1dae7e0e58b4 \
>  _scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full
>  _scratch_mount
>  
> -runtime=4
> +runtime=8
>  
>  # Create enough IO so that we need around $runtime seconds to relocate it.
>  #
> @@ -42,11 +42,21 @@ sleep $runtime
>  kill $write_pid
>  wait $write_pid
>  
> +# Unmount and mount again the fs to clear any cached data and metadata, so that
> +# it's less likely balance has already finished when we try to cancel it below.
> +_scratch_cycle_mount
> +
>  # Now balance should take at least $runtime seconds, we can cancel it at
>  # $runtime/2 to ensure a success cancel.
>  _run_btrfs_balance_start -d --bg "$SCRATCH_MNT"
> -sleep $(($runtime / 2))
> -$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance cancel "$SCRATCH_MNT"
> +sleep $(($runtime / 4))
> +# It's possible that balance has already completed. It's unlikely but often
> +# it may happen due to virtualization, caching and other factors, so ignore
> +# any error about no balance currently running.
> +$BTRFS_UTIL_PROG balance cancel "$SCRATCH_MNT" 2>&1 | grep -iq 'not in progress'
> +if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
> +	_not_run "balance finished before we could cancel it"
> +fi

fstests(btrfs/213) failed once here.

btrfs/213 22s ... - output mismatch (see /usr/hpc-bio/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad)
    --- tests/btrfs/213.out     2023-03-28 06:09:10.372680814 +0800
    +++ /usr/hpc-bio/xfstests/results//btrfs/213.out.bad        2023-08-12 20:31:47.848303940 +0800
    @@ -1,2 +1,5 @@
     QA output created by 213
    +/usr/hpc-bio/xfstests/tests/btrfs/213: line 59: _not_run: command not found
    +ERROR: error during balancing '/mnt/scratch': No space left on device
    +There may be more info in syslog - try dmesg | tail
     Silence is golden

we need to fix the error of '_not_run: command not found'  firstly.

I will update the info if fstests(btrfs/213) fails again.

Best Regards
Wang Yugui (wangyugui@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
2023/08/12






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux