Re: [PATCH] t_ofd_locks: fix initialization sequence

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]




10.07.2023 09:27, Murphy Zhou пишет:
What while loop do you mean and what
doesn't hurt? Does the rest of the patch
look ok?
I mean the do-while loop ensures a new semaphore is created.
OK, given that the initial patch was problematic
for review, I posted the v2, which introduces
the simpler scheme, and is better structured:

https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20230731112807.1463846-1-stsp2@xxxxxxxxx/T/#t

Does this help?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux