Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > btrf/122 is failing on a system with 64k page size: > > QA output created by 122 > +ERROR: illegal nodesize 16384 (smaller than 65536) > +mount: /mnt/scratch: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/vdb2, missing codepage or helper program, or other error. > +mount /dev/vdb2 /mnt/scratch failed > +(see /xfstests-dev/results//btrfs/122.full for details) > > Mkfs.btrfs sets the default node size to 16K when the sector size is less > than 16K, and it matches the sector size when it's greater than 16K. > So, there's no need to explicitly set it. > > Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: Remove the redundant explicit nodesize option from mkfs.btrfs. > Changed: Title from "btrfs/122: adjust nodesize to match pagesize" > > > tests/btrfs/122 | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) Thanks for fixing this. I have tested this on Power with 64k pagesize and x86 with 4k pagesize. Please feel free to add - Tested-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx> -ritesh
