On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 09:58:39AM +0200, Carlos Maiolino wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 03:52:34AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:13:12PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:36:05PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 08:16:50AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 03:42:07PM +0200, cem@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > > > > From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > > > Calling _test_mkfs on an already initialized xfs FS will fail as the > > > > > > initialization is not enforced by '-f' argument, unless it's included in > > > > > > MKFS_OPTIONS. > > > > > > So, adding 'RECREATE_TEST_DEV=true' to the config file end up being useless > > > > > > for xfs filesystems. > > > > > > > > > > > > So, adding the a specific xfs optiong in _test_mkfs using -f argument > > > > > > makes RECREATE_TEST_DEV actually useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Makese sense to me, > > > > > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Hi Darrick, > > > > > > > > I just noticed that there's not any place use "_test_options mkfs", I remembered > > > > SCRATCH_DEV support rtdev and logdev, the TEST_DEV looks not support that, but > > > > the "_test_options()" looks like hoping to support. > > > > > > Hmmm, that's a very good point -- _test_mkfs() fails to format a test > > > filesystem with external logs or rt volumes even if the config specified > > > that. Perhaps change the patch to add: > > > > > > xfs) > > > _test_options mkfs > > > > Current _test_options() only works for xfs, it returns directly if FSTYP != XFS. > > It more likes a _test_xfs_options. We don't have _test_$FSTYP_options() function, > > so if we'd like to have a common _test_options(), I think we should deal with > > fs specific things in _test_options() inside, then call _test_options once before > > the "case $FSTYP in ...". > > This seems fine, I'm short on time these days, I'll try to find some time to > work on this. > > But in meantime, wouldn't it required the '-f' option to be passed to mkfs.xfs > anyway? Calling _test_options before 'case $FSTYP ...' will still require use to > call mkfs.xfs -f, so, can't the initial patch be applied already? If Darrick's > updated solution isn't good enough for now, the original patch will fix at > least part of the problem (without external log/rtdev cases) right away. Yes, let's please get at least the bare fix merged. --D > -- > Carlos > > > > > Thanks, > > Zorro > > > > > $MKFS_XFS_PROG -f $TEST_OPTIONS $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $TEST_DEV > > > ;; > > > > > > Does that look right? > > > > > > --D > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zorro > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --D > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > common/rc | 3 +++ > > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc > > > > > > index 37074371..dd5d7bc1 100644 > > > > > > --- a/common/rc > > > > > > +++ b/common/rc > > > > > > @@ -605,6 +605,9 @@ _test_mkfs() > > > > > > ext2|ext3|ext4) > > > > > > $MKFS_PROG -t $FSTYP -- -F $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $TEST_DEV > > > > > > ;; > > > > > > + xfs) > > > > > > + $MKFS_PROG -t $FSTYP -- -f $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $TEST_DEV > > > > > > + ;; > > > > > > *) > > > > > > yes | $MKFS_PROG -t $FSTYP -- $MKFS_OPTIONS $* $TEST_DEV > > > > > > ;; > > > > > > -- > > > > > > 2.30.2 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
